Monday, December 23, 2013

Gravitational Field Strength


 Gravitational Field Strength


In the last lesson we were able to combine our two formulas for force due to gravity to get a new

formula.


F
g

=Fg


m
test g

=


Gm
testMe

r


2


g


=


GM
e

r


2


●


The great news is that the mass (shown above as the mass of the Earth “Me”) can actually be


any mass. It could be the mass of the moon, Mars, an asteroid, whatever!


●


In fact, we should replace mass of the Earth in the formula with just mass, since it can be any


mass.


g


=Gm


r


2


g = gravitational field strength (m/s

2)


G = Universal Gravitational Constant

m = mass of object producing the field (kg)

r = distance from centre of mass (m)


●


This formula lets you calculate the the gravitational field strength (the acceleration due to


gravity) caused by that mass ata specific distance from its centre.


Example 1



: The planet Mars has a mass of 6.42e23 kg and a radius (from its centre to the surface) of


3.38e6 m.

a)

Determine how much a 60.0 kg person would weigh on Mars.


b)

Compare it to his weight on Earth.


c)

Determine how heavy the 60.0 kg person would “feel” as an apparent mass in kilograms on


Mars.

a) To determine someone's weight, we first need to know the acceleration due to gravity

on Mars.


g



=Gm


r



2


g



=6.67e-11(6.42e23)


(


3.38e6)2


g



=3.748240608=3.75m/s2


7/12/2012 © studyphysics.ca Page 1 of 4 / Section 4.3

So the person's weight will be...


F

g

=mg


F

g

=60.0(3.748240608)


F

g

=224.8944365=225N


b) On Earth the person has a weight of…


F

g

=mg


F

g

=60.0(9.81)


F

g

=588.6=589N


Probably the easiest way to compare the person's weight on Mars and the Earth is to find

the ratio of the two.


F

gearth

F

gMars


=


589


225


=2.6172279=2.62


Since this is a ratio, it has no units (the Newtons canceled each other out). It simply

means that you weigh 2.62 times more on the Earth as compared to Mars.

c) The reason I asked for the person's

apparent mass is because I want to know how


heavy the person thinks he feels in kilograms. In reality,

the true mass of a person


never changes


. I am asking how heavy he feels based on the facts that he feels lighter


on Mars, and that they are used to the effects of gravity on Earth. We will take the

person's weight on Mars and the gravity of Earth to find out the apparent mass.


F

g

=mg


m



=


F

g

g

m



=224.8944365


9.81


m



=22.925019=22.9kg


Keep in mind that the person's mass is still really 60.0 kg. He just feels like he is only

22.9 kg because he is on Mars.


The Elevator Question


The concept of gravity becomes a bit more complicated when you examine a complex system like an

elevator going up and down.


●


It might sound strange to call an elevator complex, but it really does make a challenging


problem.


●


How do you think you would solve a question that asks you about your weight as an elevator


accelerates up or down?

7/12/2012 © studyphysics.ca Page 2 of 4 / Section 4.3


Going up...


When the elevator is accelerating up, what would happen to your weight?


●


Have you ever noticed that when an elevator first starts to move up, you feel as though you are being


pushed down a little?


●


This is because you can feel the elevator’s acceleration. The elevator is pushing you up, so


(according to Newton's Third Law) you push down against the floor.


●


It basically makes you feel a bit heavier for a moment.


●


A scale would show this as an increase in your weight (temporarily). If the scale shows


kilograms, it would show your


apparent mass as being bigger than your true mass.


Going down...


What would happen to your weight if the elevator started to accelerate down?


●


You would feel the elevator drop out underneath you.


●


If it really dropped out underneath you, it would feel just like being on the “Space Shot ” at


Galaxyland as it is falling … you’d feel weightless!


●


You feel this way because as the elevator accelerates down (away from you) it is not pushing up against


you as hard as it was before. Since the floor is not pushing as hard up against you, you are not pushing

as hard down against the floor (Newton's Third Law again).


●


A scale would show your weight as being less. If the scale shows kilograms, it would show your


apparent




mass as being smaller than your true mass.


Let’s look at how we would actually figure out some numbers for this type of question by looking at an example.


●


Keep the following in the back of your mind. A regular scale that you buy in a regular store is made to


measure things in kilograms, and it is built for Earth’s regular gravity of 9.81m/s


2. You’ll see why this is


important later.


Example 2




: You are standing on a scale in an elevator. You have a mass of 75kg. Determine what a scale would


show as your


apparent mass (in kilograms) if…


a) the elevator starts to accelerate upwards at 3.0m/s


2.


We have three parts in the formula that we will have to use:

F


NET = the overall force acting on the person causing acceleration upwards.


F


g = the force due to gravity pulling the person down.


F


N = the force of the scale on the floor pushing up against the person.


We should mostly be concerned with what the normal force is, since however hard the scale has to push

the person upwards will show up as a reading on the scale. We know the force due to gravity, since that's

just the person's weight. The net force is just overall what is happening to the person.


F

NET

=Fg+FN


ma



=mg+FN


ma



−mg=FN


m



(a−g)=FN


75


[3.0−(−9.81)]=FN


75


[12.81]=FN


F

N

=960.75


F

N

=9.6e2N


7/12/2012 © studyphysics.ca Page 3 of 4 / Section 4.3


We start off with a standard net force formula. We do

a quick substitution, since F


NET = ma and Fg = mg.


Next step is to move “mg” to the other side. Since

both formulas on the left side have “m” we can factor

it out. Now start putting in the numbers, watching

out for the directions of the accelerations. This lets us

calculate the normal force. As hard as the scale is

pushing the person up, the person must be pushing

down just as hard which tells us the weight the scale

will show in Newtons.


The question asked about the

apparent mass, not the weight of the person.


●


I can change this into a reading in kilograms by remembering that the scale we're using


has no idea what is going on... it was originally calibrated to be sitting in someone's

bathroom where gravity is a nice constant 9.81m/s

2.


●


This is not the true mass of the person, since mass never really changes.


F

N

=mg


m



=


F

N

g

m



=960.75


9.81


m



=97.93577982=98kg


So a regular scale shows an

apparent mass of 98 kg!


b) the elevator starts to accelerate downwards at 4.0m/s

2.


We’ll handle this part of the question the same way.


F

NET

=Fg+FN


ma



=mg+FN


ma



−mg=FN


m



(a−g)=FN


75


[−4.0−(−9.81)]=FN


75


[5.81]=FN


F

N

=435.75=4.4e2N


Since the scale is pushing up against the person with 4.4e2 N of force (the weight that shows on

the scale in Newtons), the person's apparent mass will be...


F

N

=mg


m



=


F

N

g

m



=435.75


9.81


m



=44.418960=44kg

So a regular scale shows your apparent mass as 44 kg.

http://www.studyphysics.ca/

Sunday, December 22, 2013

radiation of heat and light

ra·di·a·tion (rd-shn)
n.
1. The act or process of radiating: the radiation of heat and light from a fire.
2. Physics
a. Emission and propagation and emission of energy in the form of rays or waves.
b. Energy radiated or transmitted as rays, waves, in the form of particles.
c. A stream of particles or electromagnetic waves emitted by the atoms and molecules of a radioactive substance as a result of nuclear decay.
 

Saturday, May 11, 2013

Time is born time is dead endless cycle. One thinks the cycle of birth and death for the better then how this applies to the universe?

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Stiplulation of Gravitional Waves Pulsating heavenly Bodies 03242010

My hypothesis that heavenly bodies like the earth, moon, planets and stars are pulsating and in the process they generate gravitational waves.
Frequency?
Magnitude?

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Large Hadron Collider Ready at gigantic CERN Laboratory in the Jura mountains just outside of Geneva


A little more than a year after its ill-fated debut, the Large Hadron Collider is getting ready to roll again. The controversial device, including an 18-mile circular tunnel -- bigger than the London Underground's Circle Line -- is housed in the gigantic CERN laboratory in the Jura mountains just outside of Geneva, on the border of France and Switzerland. Using the particle collider, the largest ever built, would allow scientists to re-create conditions that existed a trillionth of a second after the big bang, as well as prove the existence of the spooky "Higgs boson" entity, also called the "God Particle" which give "things" (including living things like you and me) their mass. It is further anticipated to solve the mystery of "dark matter" and shed light on many other quirky physics conundrums.
http://www.thisisbrandx.com/

Saturday, October 17, 2009

Magnetic Monopole


Researchers have discovered a magnetic equivalent to electricity: single magnetic charges that can behave and interact like electrical ones.

The work is the first to make use of the magnetic monopoles that exist in special crystals known as spin ice.

Writing in Nature journal, a team showed that monopoles gather to form a "magnetic current" like electricity.

The phenomenon, dubbed "magnetricity", could be used in magnetic storage or in computing.

Magnetic monopoles were first predicted to exist over a century ago, as a perfect analogue to electric charges.

Although there are protons and electrons with net positive and negative electric charges, there were no particles in existence which carry magnetic charges. Rather, every magnet has a "north" and "south" pole.

Current event

In September this year, two research groups independently reported the existence of monopoles - "particles" which carry an overall magnetic charge. But they exist only in the spin ice crystals.

These crystals are made up of pyramids of charged atoms, or ions, arranged in such a way that when cooled to exceptionally low temperatures, the materials show tiny, discrete packets of magnetic charge.


The loops of a magnetic field can be seen in the arrangement of iron filings
Now one of those teams has gone on to show that these "quasi-particles" of magnetic charge can move together, forming a magnetic current just like the electric current formed by moving electrons.

They did so by using sub-atomic particles called muons, created at the Science and Technology Facilities Council's (STFC) ISIS neutron and muon source near Oxford.

The muons decay millionths of a second after their production into other sub-atomic particles. But the direction in which these resulting particles fly off is an indicator of the magnetic field in a tiny region around the muons.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8307804.stm